I will be getting my Bsc and graduating!
I have a fantastic science academic advisor / counselor who has helped me a ton since I started the biomedical sciences program at York. Pretty much every time I was paranoid and had a question about something, she was always there for help, support, and advice. You honestly can’t do anything on your own, and if you really think you can, I think you’re underestimating the support you’re probably getting from the people around you.
When I told her I got accepted into medical school, she suggested that I might be able to still get a 3-year bachelors degree. I am currently in a 4-year biology program, and while I don’t have enough biology credits for a 3-year biology degree, I had heard before that getting a 3-year general science degree might be possible if I got in this year, though I really didn’t expect anything. Anyways, she told me last week that she’d get my academic record checked to see what would be possible, and I got this awesome email today:
Hi Joshua,
We’ve taken a look and you are eligible for the BSc (no major)…
So that’s cool. I wanted to be a York alumni, so that’s great. Also, I had the option of possibly getting into this year’s convocation, but I decided that I’d rather do it next year with all of my friends. My name won’t be in the booklet if I do that, but I don’t really care about that!
What’s the deal with cumulative exams?
While we’re on the topic of academics (sort of), I want to ask, seriously, why are there cumulative exams? I honestly don’t get it. You’ve given me tests and midterms, and now you want me to learn new material AND test me again on something I’ve already proven I know?
I have had three courses in my undergraduate program that had non-cumulative exams, but the rest have all been cumulative. For some courses, particularly those in biology, it’s just crazy. There’s such a ridiculous amount of material to know, and it feels ridiculous to have to go over the same stuff again – especially when you have other exams to do as well.
I guess one argument could be that the newer material builds on the previous. Perhaps that’s true for courses based primarily on understanding (and less on innocuous facts), but trust me, I’ve had completely fact-based courses (e.g. the wonderful biochemistry courses) that had cumulative exams, and where understanding of one section had little dependence on prior sections.
Okay, so maybe it’s to “prove” that we’re able to know the entire course at once. But how important is this really? Honestly, I am just as likely to forget any random details after the second time around. My understanding of the material may always be there, but again, that’s already been proven.
So really, I think the only purpose is just to have another way to separate the hard workers from the lazier people (oops, I guess that’s why I’m complaining, because I am one!). I guess that’s not really a bad thing, in terms of the value of a degree and what it would mean to employers and other parties. But I really don’t see any significant academic or learning value that comes from doing it.
I don’t know, what do you think?
Related Posts:
- Clarification of My Last Post
- Success: Geography Midterm Finally Completed!
- So This is What It’s Like to be “Below Average”
- So I had my clinical skills exam today…
- Medical School Week 2 Reflection
Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader.
Comments
Hey Joshua,
I totally agree about the exams. I guess I just like learning for learning not cramming facts in the night before. lol
I have a question. This is my first year at york, loved iT btw! How do you set up an appointment with an academic adviser?
Cumulative exams? How are they different from normal exams? Anyway, I think they serve a pretty important purpose, since everyone tends to forget A LOT right after the unit tests. So well, if you already know the stuff, they should be easy to study for.
wow really sarah? you loved your first year at york? despite the strike and all the false fire alarms and bomb threats during exams??
I think that I’d be more likely to look for connections between units if I knew that I’d be tested cumulatively. I think that this kind of wholesome perspective is needed to truly understand and appreciate most subjects, and avoiding cumulative testing would discourage that.
Even in courses with little connection between sections, knowing that a cumulative exam is coming up should give me more initiative to review regularly. Now, I don’t know how useful it is to just forget everything for most of the year and cram it all at the last minute, but for regular reviewers, I think that cumulative examinations can provide a more solid and wholesome understanding of the course!
I categorically despise fact-based courses with cumulative exams. It just serves to unnecessarily increase the amount of memorization for finals. Its total fucking bullshit and I hate profs that do it, they’re assholes.