Archive | January, 2009

And so it gets more interesting again…

After yesterday’s very exciting email from McMaster, I received another email from them today:

Hello Joshua – I am following up on my message yesterday regarding your invitation to interview at McMaster. You have been invited to interview based on the information provided at the time of application (in terms of meeting the minimum academic requirements). With the ongoing labour dispute at York University however, it may well be that you will not be able to meet these requirements, unless you have made alternate plans or if York University comes up with a plan that will allow students to complete their credits by the end of the regular term.

Our requirements, which remain unchanged, are that you have completed at least 30 half-year credits and that these are graded, on a transcript and that transcript is in our hands by June 30th.

We wanted you to be aware of this issue prior to accepting the invitation to interview. You are certainly welcome to accept the interview, but we wanted you to be aware that, if successful, you may not be in a position to accept an offer of admission.

Kind of a similar message that Queen’s gave me several weeks ago. I understand this is a policy, and I am not mad at the medical schools for this. It’s not their fault, and this is just an unfortunate situation for students in my situation.

Unfortunately for me, York’s new post-strike schedule proposes that final exams will end on June 2. That doesn’t leave much time for exams to be graded, final grades to be compiled, and official final grades to be posted – plus the time it takes to get the transcript in the hands of the medical school. I’m not sure how long it normally takes to do this, but it could definitely be a bit tight.

So I emailed someone I know at York today about the situation, and she said it’s going to be looked into. She said York is serious about ensuring that students are not disadvantaged in any way because of the strike. Hopefully that’s a good sign. I’ll keep everyone posted.

In other news, I got my McMaster Interview package in the mail today. My interview is going to take place on Saturday, March 28. For those of you who don’t know, McMaster’s interview format is something called Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI) – a type of interview format where there are say 10 stations, and you spend 7-10 minutes at each station doing a different task, such as answering a question, analyzing a situation, role playing, etc. Definitely Google MMI if you are interested.

It seems quite interesting, and I’m not exactly sure if this format plays to my strengths. My gut feeling is that it doesn’t (I think a more traditional interview tends to work to my strengths), but I’m going to come up with a plan for preparing, so we’ll see how that goes.

That’s all for today. Thanks again for everyone’s support along the way!

I’m Not Always Right – If You Think I’m Wrong, Tell Me!

As you guys know, I recently wrote an article questioning the importance motivations should play in the medical school admissions process.

I wrote that article because it’s one of those issues that is often very one-sided, and I think there are definitely some valid points to the perspective I tried to share. I think the issue is way more complicated than it’s often made out to be.

I knew that article was going to rile some people up, and I’m glad it did. I like hearing other perspectives, and I like debate. I feel like discussing and debating ideas with other people is how I learn best. Being able to understand different sides of an issue is invaluable because then you’re able to see a much larger part of the picture.

For those of you who have been involved in debate, you know that often times you have to argue for a side that you won’t necessarily agree with. Yet, most of the time, the reason you are even debating the issue in the first place is because the issue simply isn’t clear cut. Because, if the truth was obvious, where is the debate?

I think some people might read my articles and think that I’m right a lot of the time just because I wrote it. On the contrary, I think you should question what I write. That’s where the real learning comes in.

I like to write a lot about personal experience and advice. But I also want to write things that challenge you to stop and spend some serious time thinking. I think stuff like that might be even more cool and more valuable than plain old advice (which of course, might be wrong!)

So if you think I’m wrong about something, or if there’s another side to the coin I haven’t shared, let me know!

Invitation to Interview at McMaster University MD Program

Just got this email…

Dear applicant

This note is to advise you that an invitation to interview package is on the way to you in the mail. A response to our offer of interview is required by February 13th. If you have not received your package by Tuesday, February 10th, please contact me on this email.

Congratulations and we look forward to meeting you this Spring.

So this is pretty cool!

I’m pretty stoked, and really happy that the York strike doesn’t seem to have hurt me in this year’s medical school application cycle.

This was also good timing… I feel a bit more motivated to start working on my essay (yes it’s true, that has been untouched for the entire strike) and preparing for interviews.

Now time to come up with a plan for approaching this interview.

Oh, and should mention, thanks to Back to Work Legislation, it looks like I will be back at school on Monday.

It’s going to be a hectic four months, but hopefully everything works out!

Becoming a Doctor for the “Right Reasons” – Should That Really Matter?

rightreasons

NOTE: This is probably the most controversial article on the blog. I myself learned a lot from the discussion in the comments that followed, and I am willing to admit my current thoughts on this subject are quite different from when I initially wrote this. However, I think there is great educational value in keeping this article and the comments up. That being said, I would appreciate it if people read all the comments and my responses before making judgments about my perspective on the issue, as I think my initial article doesn’t explain my point of view all that well, and can lead to misinterpretations of my thoughts.

During elementary and high school, I felt as if numerous sources in society were encouraging the concept of “nobility” as the greatest thing in the world. Things like school and the media were constantly championing ideas like volunteerism, servant leadership, environmentalism, etc. to the point where it was suggested that being a “good, noble” person involved thinking and acting with those ideas in mind.

And while I myself was swept up by those ideas, especially during high school, I began noticing some problems when I entered university. I started realizing that issues aren’t as simple as we often make them to be. For instance, bring up a random high school discussion on the environment, and you often hear things like “yah, coal plants are bad! We should get rid of all of them and power our cities completely with solar energy” followed by nods of agreement. But then if you do a bit more research, you start to learn that solar panels are currently pretty expensive as well as take up a ridiculous amount of space, such that it may just not be feasible.

It seems that the more you know, and the more open you are to possibilities, the more complex the world becomes.

The concept of nobility is particularly prevalent with “premeds” and their interest in medicine. A lot of students seem taken by the idea that it’s good to be pursuing medicine for the “right reasons” – usually this refers to pursuing medicine for the sake of practicing medicine, often driven by the desire to heal others, improve lives, or an interest in a specific field of medicine. Conversely, these same students usually see it as sort of taboo to be pursuing medicine for the money or prestige.

Personally, while I am generally interested in people’s motivations for what they do, I don’t think it is right to judge a medical school applicant solely on their intentions. I think it’s wrong, and kind of illogical, to immediately associate noble intentions with good and not-so-noble intentions with bad, in terms of being a physician.

The Patient’s Perspective

Continue Reading →

Understanding Expectation and Avoiding Being Results Oriented

expectation

I have always done well in school my whole life. Throughout both elementary and high school, I had rarely gotten close to a failing grade in anything. And even the few times I did, the weight of those assignments or tests was not that significant, and as you eventually learn, high school marks don’t matter that much once you reach a certain point.

When I got to university, I had planned on taking school a bit more seriously. Unlike high school where you have numerous tests, assignments and exams per course (and thus, failing a single test probably does not affect your final mark too much), university courses tend to be composed of fewer components that are worth more. As a result, messing up even one test could now significantly hurt your final mark. For example, the microeconomics course I took last year had two tests (25% each) and one final exam (50%). The final exam itself had just 40 multiple choice questions, meaning that each question was worth 1.25% of my final mark!

However, the bigger reason why I wanted to take my university academics more seriously is because I was interested in eventually applying to medical school. While medical schools differ on how much they value GPA, the fact of the matter is that given the competitive nature of the process, it makes sense to do your best. You will never know when that extra point might just be the difference between an acceptance and a rejection.

Nonetheless, the reality is that university is more difficult than high school. And while I wasn’t expecting it, I did hit a rough patch during the fall of my first year. There was a particular week where, back to back, I got the two worst marks I have ever received in university so far – 60’s on both a physics and chemistry test. I was partly upset because of how it could affect my final marks in the course, but I think I was even more hurt because I expected to do better than that.

However, did this mean I was now a C-student in my physics and chemistry courses?

Expectation and the Long Run

Continue Reading →

The Strike is Still On

For those of you who haven’t been following the strike at York University, the union held a forced ratification vote the last two days regarding York University’s latest offer. Essentially, at one point during the entire negotiation process, the university is allowed to directly send an offer to the general union members to vote on (usually the union bargaining team has to deem an offer acceptable before it can be voted on by its general members).

Well, the vote was held the past two days, and all three units of the union voted to reject York’s settlement offer (of the union members who showed up, 63% voted no overall) – in short, the strike is still on.

I’m a bit surprised, but not really. I though there was a good chance one of the units was going to vote yes, but I’m not completely surprised at the results. The executive of the union (unsurprisingly) was pushing for a rejection of York’s offer, and well, they got it.

The year isn’t lost yet, but however the situation ends, it won’t be pretty. We could lose the year, or the year could get pushed into the summer, which kind of sucks.

My brother likes to think I’m on vacation right now, and while it is most definitely a “break”, knowing you have four months off during the summer is not the same as continuously thinking you could be at school the very next week. You can’t make long term plans, and you really can’t “enjoy” the break you normally would because it could end at any moment.

I’m still hoping that no matter the result, my eligibility for medical schools isn’t compromised this year, but at this point, I can’t help but be concerned.

Humility

humility

One of my biggest pet peeves is arrogance and cockiness. I just find it super annoying to talk to people who like to talk about how much better they are at something than other people or, worse, like to put down other people who are worse than them at something. And while it may very well be true that they are absolutely outstanding at something, I could really care less sometimes.

I’m not saying I’m absolutely immune to having an ego. In my defense though, I don’t really get the urge to get into ego wars except with really arrogant people. Even then I’m pretty hesitant about doing it because I don’t really want to sink to that level.

One instance that comes to mind is when I see some of my undergraduate biology peers talking about other majors, such as psychology, kinesiology, or majors in the arts. I’ve seen some of them brag about how much harder biology is, and about how much smarter they are than some students in other majors and stuff like that. I don’t really care for arguments like that because I believe that different types of intelligences dominate various fields in the first place. Being able to excel at anything is admirable, regardless of the field. In any case, I know of arts majors who I think are way more intelligent in the traditional sense than many of those same science students I’ve seen waving their egos around.

Fortunately, I don’t like to talk to people like that, so I don’t really have to hear it on a regular basis. But that doesn’t stop it from annoying me!

There’s one message board I visit sometimes catered towards students interested in medical school. It amazes, but not really surprises me, when I see that some of the medical students who post are ridiculously arrogant. I’ve noticed that while they seemed kind of obnoxious before getting into medical school, they really turned on the arrogance when they got in. I’ve seen some of them absolutely attack undergraduate students, as if the fact that they are medical students puts them in sort of magical position that allows them to call everyone else stupid. Of course, when you are on a message board where 90% of the users are dreaming to be in your position, no one dares to argue with you! I’m not denying that I sometimes see high school or undergraduate students ask some relatively obvious questions, but if that makes you mad or you get pleasure from making them feel stupid, then I think that is just really sad.

Everything is relative. There’s no question that I often get questions in tutoring or from the readers of this website that seem absolutely obvious to me – but that’s because I’m pretty experienced in those fields. If those questions weren’t obvious to me, then I would be the wrong person to ask! The reason I don’t get mad or ignore questions is because I understand that I wouldn’t wanted to be called stupid or ignored if I had a question myself. I know there are definitely topics out there where I would say or ask “dumb” things.

The reason why some of these students lack humility is often because they haven’t seen how much larger the world is, and therefore, haven’t been in many positions where they are at the “bottom rung” of the ladder. Once you experience a lot of situations where the people around you are just so much better than you at something, you start to learn some humility, and realize there is still so much to learn about everything.

I’d like to think I’m a pretty humble guy in general (or am I not humble for saying that? hmmm…). When I did really well in the scholarship process in Grade 12, I didn’t really tell anyone except my family. I don’t think anyone except my family knew about all of the scholarships I had won. I just didn’t feel comfortable talking to my friends about how well I had done when I knew that many of them could be struggling to pay off university; it just didn’t feel right.

I think the main reason for this is that through winning awards, scholarships, or competitions, I end up having to meet people who are way better than me at different things. For example, while I was probably one of the top mathematics students in my school, when I went to the Ontario Mathematics Olympics, I was not even close to being one of the best mathematics students there. Through experiences like that, I know how it feels to be on the other side when you aren’t as good at something as the people around you, and so I sure as heck don’t want to make other people feel bad about their abilities.

Furthermore, one of the problems with having too big of an ego is that it prevents you from developing and improving yourself. If you don’t believe there is more to learn, you probably won’t get better at something. One of the things I’ve noticed about the top people in many fields is that they are often quite humble, in the sense that while they realize they are good (i.e. they are still confident), they are humble enough to recognize that they aren’t perfect and there is always room for improvement.

Scholarship Interview Advice: TD Canada Trust Scholarship for Community Leadership

uoftebookbanner

Although I am a recipient of the TD Scholarship, I have no experience on the judging committee, so please take my information or advice with a grain of salt. Oh, and good luck!

Dress Code

In general for interviews, I think anywhere from semi-formal to formal is fine. For my interview, I wore a dress shirt, dress pants, and dress shoes – no tie, no blazer. I honestly don’t think the judges really care about your attire as long as it’s presentable.

Pre-Interview

I believe you are asked to come to your interview for maybe half an hour or so before it’s actually your turn. You get to spend this time with a few past TD Scholars, and feel free to ask them questions and just have a nice relaxing chat. Hopefully the warm welcome will take your mind and nerves away from the situation.

In addition, you will receive an information sheet with a short biography of each of your judges. The judging panel includes Jane Thompson (Executive Director of the TD Scholarship program), a past TD scholar, and around three leaders from the community. The point of the biographies is just to give you a bit of background information on who you will be talking to. Don’t worry about memorizing the biographies, it’s not like you will be quizzed on them or anything! That being said, it’s some good information that you can use to maybe figure out how you can better relate and connect with them.

Inside the Interview

When you enter the interview room, I suggest going up to each judge, shake each of their hands, and get to know their names before sitting down – I think it’s important to know who you are talking to during the interview.

As far as questions, I think they were pretty simple. I found the TD interview process pretty relaxing and laid back. The judges seemed more concerned with just getting to know me than asking me really difficult or trappy questions.

Most of my questions were pretty basic – tell me about this from your application? Why did you start this? Oh, so it says here you are interested in studying neuroscience in university, why? It says here you are in a choir, tell me about that?

Conversely, I never got questions like: What are the most important qualities of a leader? What are your strengths or weaknesses? Nothing like that. All of the questions were just there to learn more about me as a person and the activities I’ve been involved in.

The most important thing is to answer honestly and be yourself. Sorry if that is cliche, but I think not being completely myself is what hurt me at my Loran interviews. During that process, I tried too hard to answer “correctly” instead of answering honestly, and that really messed me up. I think I prepared for a week for the Loran, whereas for the TD, I maybe prepared for maybe 15 minutes the day before, and just decided to walk in and speak honestly – and it worked!

For example, I’m pretty sarcastic as a person and I like to joke around, so I was sarcastic and made jokes when I felt like it in the interview – I didn’t force anything, I just spoke as I would normally speak to people. So honestly, just be yourself, and answer truthfully and from the heart.

At least from my experience, that’s what TD cares about. The want to see real people in their real element. There were even times in the interview where the judges were discussing random ideas with each other and not just asking me questions – that’s how laid back the TD scholarship interview is.

Hope that helps, and best of luck to all the finalists!

uoftebookbanner

Sensitivity

sensitivity

One of the things that fascinates me is the different types of sensitivity that exist among people, and our tolerance for sensitive issues. Everyone reacts differently to issues and experiences. Some of us are more sensitive in some situations while completely indifferent in others. By sharing with you my own sort of sensitivity spectrum, I hope it encourages you to reflect on your own, as well as those of your friends and family around you. I think by understanding your own sensitivity and of those nearby, you will be able to better understand others and forge more meaningful relationships.

Emotional Sensitivity

Continue Reading →

Medical School Admissions: Pointless Complaining

pointlesscomplaints

Pointless complaining is something that we are all guilty of at one point or another. When we get frustrated or upset about things outside of our control, we often end up making it personal, and just vent and whine.

Human beings are selfish by nature. We do things that makes us happy and avoid things that don’t. We look at situations primarily from our own perspective, and approach situations with the overall goal of keeping ourselves happy and improving our lives.

The problem with this selfish perspective is that it often prevents us from seeing the “whole picture”. By being selfish, we look at a lot if ideas or actions as being “right” or ‘wrong” – usually, we believe our ideas or action are the “right” ones. Often times, if you step back, you’ll realize that right and wrong are simply relative – that quite often, two opposing sides are merely different (and that no one is absolutely right or wrong).

I see it a lot of the time when students argue about the medical school admissions process. Every medical school has a slightly different admissions process. Queen’s medical school has GPA and MCAT cut offs – once you meet them, you are guaranteed an interview and your GPA and MCAT do not matter anymore. Schools like the University of Toronto have a more holistic approach where they look at your entire application before granting interviews – that being said, they are very academic-based, and your GPA is weighted heavily.

For example, I often see students with lower GPAs complaining that Toronto’s system is bad because GPA shouldn’t be as important – that there are more important qualities for a physician to have, like communication, patience, and a good bed-side manner. And that these qualities are better evaluated through the interview, which should thus be worth more. However, I often wonder if the students would be complaining at all if they had high GPAs and had an advantage in the Toronto process?

Conversely, there are students who vent about schools who use the MCAT in their admissions process. They argue that the MCAT is a single test, and therefore, is full of variance and should be trusted way less than GPA, which a student works on for years. Not surprising, these comments often come from frustrated students who did very well in university but for whatever reason, just can’t pull it off on the MCAT.

I’m not saying that these arguments have no merit – in fact, the arguments do have merit. That being said, so do the counter arguments, such as the fact that the MCAT is standardized, and therefore, allows applicants to be compared in the same arena. There are a gazillion arguments that can go back and forth.

Yet I can’t help but feel that many of us choose the arguments that help our cases the best – it’s just human nature. However, having these biased perspectives prevent us from looking at situations objectively, and subsequently, prevent us from providing helpful analysis.

For instance, on this issue of admissions, we often end up complaining about how the admissions process does not fit our own strengths, instead of seriously analyzing what would be best for the application process as a whole – i.e. what process would really be best for developing the best physicians possible? While we think we are making constructive criticism about the process, we are often only giving our criticism because we are hurt by the truth.

Perhaps the good news is that there is no obvious “best” admissions process for producing the “best” physicians. The fact that medical schools have such different philosophies on admissions increases the likelihood that there is a medical school out there for each type of good candidate.

Instead of complaining that the process is so varied, it might be wiser to appreciate the fact that this variety is what allows so many different types of great candidates to be accepted. Am I saying that we should never criticize, or that we should not try to improve the system? Of course not – seeking improvement is always good. But whether we can make a promising difference depends on what fuels our motivations – if it’s frustration and anger, we’re not going to go very far.